Blown Away (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Blown Away2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Blown Away is refreshingly non-woke by modern standards. The show highlights artistry and competition over ideology, making it a breath of fresh air in the sea of current television. If you want glass-blowing without glass ceilings, or lectures!, this show is for you.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Blown Away focuses on glass artistry and the competition format generally rewards skill and creativity. While the usual nods to diversity are present in the casting, the show doesn't appear to sacrifice narrative or merit for identity politics. The emphasis is clearly on craftsmanship and creativity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show celebrates dedication, skill, and perseverance, classic cultural values. There's little evidence it tries to undermine family, religion, or traditional roles. It sticks to its lane, focusing on artistry and competition rather than pushing controversial cultural revisionism or moral lessons.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While some contestants come from diverse backgrounds and experiences, the main drama and focus is on individual skill and competition, not on ideological messaging. Alternative or traditional perspectives are not mocked or villainized, mostly because these topics are rarely discussed.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Evil By Design: Surviving Nygård

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.