Bludgeoning Angel Dokuro-chan (2005) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Bludgeoning Angel Dokuro-chan2005

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Bludgeoning Angel Dokuro-chan is about as far from a 'woke' show as you can get, it's chaotic, raucous, and more interested in random gags than toesping any ideological line. Old-school anime shock humor at its weirdest.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show is mainly a slapstick, absurdist comedy with over-the-top violence and raunchy humor. Identity factors like race, gender, or sexuality are not pushed to the forefront, nor is forced representation a focus. It mostly sticks to its bizarre and irreverent style rather than ideological messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the show is irreverent and occasionally mocks authority and traditional morality, it does so from a place of absurdist comedy rather than attempting to undermine cultural foundations directly. No serious subversion of gender roles or deliberate revisionism is present; if anything, it leans on old-school anime tropes.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's very little in the way of clear ideological messaging. If anything, the show seems anarchic, poking fun at everyone and everything equally, with no serious attempt at promoting modern woke stances or suppressing traditional views.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

15%

Movie poster for Twin Princess of Wonder Planet

Movie poster for The Good Witch Of The West

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.