BLUE LOCK (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

BLUE LOCK2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

BLUE LOCK keeps its boots firmly away from woke ideology, focusing on gritty sports drama and egotism. If you want your soccer served woke-free, this series delivers almost entirely on that front.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

BLUE LOCK is laser-focused on merit, competition, and personal drive rather than identity politics. Characters are judged by skill and ambition, not their identity boxes. There’s no obvious forced representation or narrative detour to score political points, just pure, egotistical soccer madness.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While BLUE LOCK does challenge traditional notions of teamwork, it’s not in favor of woke ideology, just raw, cutthroat individualism. Masculinity and ambition are celebrated, not subverted, and there’s no agenda-driven critique of family, religion, or culture.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no woke echo chamber here. If anything, the show riffs hard on healthy competition, individuality, and the struggle for greatness. No lectures, no moral monoculture, just a singular obsession with being the best striker in Japan.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

15%

Movie poster for Seirei Gensouki: Spirit Chronicles

Movie poster for When Will Ayumu Make His Move?

Movie poster for More Than a Married Couple, But Not Lovers

12%

Movie poster for Doctor Elise: The Royal Lady with the Lamp

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.