Bodies (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

83%

Bodies2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Bodies" is stylish but doesn’t hide its modern ideological bent, expect more diversity focus than narrative subtlety, and don’t come looking for reverence for traditional values or robust debate. High on the woke scale for its genre.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

"Bodies" puts a heavy emphasis on diverse representation, especially across time periods, and it occasionally feels like identity factors are prioritized over story authenticity. At times, character depth seems secondary to highlighting a modern sense of diversity, which may distract from the overall narrative cohesion.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles and religious worldviews are often set aside or subtly critiqued, with female and minority characters shown as especially virtuous or forward-thinking. Established moral norms and societal values are reinterpreted to fit more current ideological trends, which might irk non-woke viewers.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Dissenting perspectives and traditional viewpoints rarely get a fair shake, and when present, opposing opinions are often depicted through antagonistic or outdated figures. There’s very little ideological pluralism, and the show's moral compass leans strongly in a modern, progressive direction.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for A Good Girl's Guide to Murder

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.