Brødrene Dal og legenden om Atlant-is (1994) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Brødrene Dal og legenden om Atlant-is1994

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A time capsule of non-woke Norwegian comedy, 'Brødrene Dal og legenden om Atlant-is' offers nonsense and absurdity without a trace of modern ideological baggage. Pure adventure, pure fun, no agendas detected.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show focuses on comedic adventure, with cast and characters reflecting Norwegian culture of the 1990s. Identity politics, forced diversity, or prioritization of ideological messages over storytelling are virtually non-existent. Characters are defined by quirks and quirks alone, not checkboxes or identity markers.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

'Brødrene Dal og legenden om Atlant-is' sticks to playful irreverence and slapstick. There is no subversion of family, religion, or traditional gender roles. The humor is squarely in the tradition of Norwegian comedy, not driven by any modern ideological motives.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no evidence of ideological uniformity or vilification of dissenting worldviews. The show is more concerned with puns and absurdity than with social commentary. Alternative viewpoints simply aren’t discussed; there’s just good old-fashioned Norwegian silliness.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Only Clouds Move the Stars

13%

Movie poster for The Other Side of Sunday

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.