Brothers and Sisters (2006) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

70%

Brothers and Sisters2006

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“Brothers and Sisters” was ahead of its time in terms of representation and progressive norms, though it tries to balance character depth with its modern takes. It’s not aggressively woke by today’s standards, but it clearly signaled where network TV was headed.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The show puts personal and identity-based drama front-and-center, but most characters are reasonably developed and storylines don’t seem entirely driven by ideology. However, representation of sexuality and family diversity is heavily emphasized for its time, sometimes overshadowing natural character growth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional family structures are often portrayed as flawed or in need of progressive change, with alternative lifestyles celebrated as more enlightened. Masculinity and religion aren’t overtly ridiculed, but the show definitely nudges viewers toward contemporary values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Conservative or dissenting viewpoints rarely get sincere treatment, when present, they're mostly foils for progressive characters. There’s not much ideological debate; the moral compass is decidedly modern, if not outright radical by 2006 standards.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Stephen King's Kingdom Hospital

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.