Cinderella (2011) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Cinderella2011

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Lux Vide’s "Cinderella" (2011) is about as non-woke as you can get today. It plays the story straight, upholds old-school virtues, and avoids modern ideological reworks, a relief from Hollywood’s typical fare.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

In our view, Lux Vide’s "Cinderella" (2011) largely sticks to traditional fairy tale storytelling. There’s no obvious evidence that identity politics or forced diversity overtake character depth or story merit. The heroine’s personality and growth are emphasized over her identity traits.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values such as family, self-sacrifice, and classic gender roles are presented in a positive light. The story leans into established fairy tale moral frameworks and doesn’t appear to undermine religion, family, or traditional masculinity.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t lampoon dissenting views or turn traditional perspectives into caricatures. It opts for a sincere retelling and maintains the moral pluralism typical of classic fairy tales, without overt modern ideological messaging.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Saint Philip Neri: I Prefer Heaven

Movie poster for White as Milk, Red as Blood

Movie poster for Medici: Masters of Florence

12%

Movie poster for The Lady with the Black Veil

Complimenti per la connessione

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.