Critical Incident (2024) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

89%

Critical Incident2024

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Critical Incident" is a near-textbook case of modern wokeness: ideology often overrides storytelling, tradition is subverted, and real debate is replaced by unchallenged consensus. Expect plenty of representation, but not much room for genuine pluralism.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

In our view, "Critical Incident" often places identity-driven casting and characterization front and center. Several main roles appear to be chosen primarily to reflect a checklist of diversity, not organic fit. Character arcs, at times, feel more about representing social issues than genuine growth or conflict.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional social structures like family, faith, and especially masculinity, are frequently sidelined or even subtly ridiculed. The show elevates non-traditional viewpoints while more classical cultural touchstones are either diminished or reworked to align with modern ideologies.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

There's minimal space for dissenting perspectives in "Critical Incident." Anyone expressing traditional views is typically a villain or comedic foil. Dialogue reflects near-total agreement on social issues, and alternative worldviews barely get a hearing.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Olivia: Hopelessly Devoted to You

86%

92%

23%

91%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.