Davos 1917 (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Davos 19172023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“Davos 1917” checks most of the woke boxes, modern identity themes take precedence over period-appropriate drama, cultural traditions are sidelined, and alternative viewpoints just don’t get a seat at the table. It’s a gold star for those hunting peak 2020s wokeness.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

“Davos 1917” leans hard into identity-driven narratives, with a female protagonist and LGBTQ romance foregrounded over traditional war-era intrigue. Some viewers might feel that personal identity and social themes overshadow historical context and storytelling depth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series appears eager to challenge traditional gender roles, placing a woman in the center of espionage and downplaying conventional family and religious structures. There's a clear intent to modernize or reinterpret early 20th-century cultural norms, which can feel like revisionism to some.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditionalist or dissenting views are largely absent, and the show’s moral universe seems firmly anchored in contemporary progressive assumptions. Those seeking a more varied or historically-rooted moral debate will find slim pickings here.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Sparrow in the Chimney

Movie poster for The Girl and the Spider

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.