DMZ (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

92%

DMZ2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

DMZ lands squarely in peak woke territory, with relentless focus on identity, revisionist takes on tradition, and a parade of uniformly progressive perspectives. Subtlety and narrative realism are sacrificed in favor of ideological signaling. If you’re looking for nuanced debate, look elsewhere.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

DMZ appears to place heavy emphasis on identity over substance, with casting and plot decisions seemingly prioritized for maximum representation points. Character complexity often takes a back seat, and several leads feel strangely flawless and under-challenged, leaving little genuine tension or growth, unless you count lecturing the audience as plot development.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional institutions like family and masculinity are consistently depicted as either villainous or completely inept, while alternative models are celebrated as unassailable ideals. The show reinterprets cultural dynamics through a rigidly modern lens, sometimes at the expense of authenticity and nuance, leaving little connection to longstanding values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews, especially those with a whiff of tradition or dissent, are painted as retrograde, villainous, or simply ignored. Every major character is firmly on Team Progress, and any opposing voices are flat, one-note antagonists, never given a sincere or nuanced argument. It’s ideological harmony, if you like just one tune.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for DC's Legends of Tomorrow

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.