Early Swallows (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

90%

Early Swallows2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Early Swallows delivers a highly woke narrative, emphasizing modern identity themes and presenting traditional values in a less favorable light. Ideological diversity is minimal, with a strong, centralized progressive perspective shaping the show’s direction.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show spotlights identity struggles, mental health, and LGBTQ themes, often placing these topics at the core of its narrative. Some viewers may feel the focus on ideology limits character arcs and makes identity overshadow skill or personal merit, indicating high levels of forced representation.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Early Swallows frequently challenges traditional values regarding family, gender, and sexuality. It presents a critical view of conservative attitudes and highlights societal shortcomings in dealing with non-mainstream identities, signaling marked reinterpretation of cultural norms.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The prevailing worldview aligns closely with progressive ideology. Traditional views are shown as sources of conflict and are rarely given nuanced treatment. Audience members seeking a diversity of perspectives or more balanced debate may find little variation in outlook across characters and plotlines.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Prychynna. The Story of Love

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.