Earth: One Amazing Day (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Earth: One Amazing Day2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Earth: One Amazing Day' is about as non-woke as it gets, a celebration of nature with no hint of modern ideological messaging or agenda. Just animals doing animal things.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

'Earth: One Amazing Day' is a nature documentary focusing on animal behavior and Earth's wonders. There is no evidence of forced representation, identity politics, or narrative compromises for ideological reasons. The content sticks to stunning visuals and factual narration.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This documentary steers clear of critiquing religion, family, masculinity, or any traditional values. It doesn't touch on human social issues at all, so cultural foundations remain completely unaffected.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no ideological monoculture here, unless you count a pro-nature message as 'woke'. The show promotes an appreciation of Earth's beauty, with no discernible political or modern ideological agendas.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Patagonia: Earth's Secret Paradise

Movie poster for Someone You Thought You Knew

Movie poster for The Boleyns: A Scandalous Family

Movie poster for Cambodia, Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge

Movie poster for Duel: Hamilton vs Verstappen

Movie poster for No Fire Zone: In the Killing Fields of Sri Lanka

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.