G.I. Joe: Resolute (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

G.I. Joe: Resolute2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

G.I. Joe: Resolute is a refreshingly non-woke entry. It keeps the focus on classic action, avoids the usual traps of forced representation, and respects traditional ideals. If you miss stories that just let heroes be heroes, this one delivers.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

G.I. Joe: Resolute sticks closely to traditional action storytelling. Characters are defined by their skills, missions, and military archetypes rather than identity politics. Diversity is organic to the military setting, not forced, and no character’s traits distract from the narrative.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show embraces classic themes like duty, sacrifice, and camaraderie. Masculinity is portrayed as strong, and heroism is valued. Traditional values are not undercut, nor are there attempts to subvert established gender roles or revisit cultural touchstones with a modern ideological lens.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional viewpoints aren’t mocked or villainized; instead, the show focuses on heroism, courage, and complex morality. There’s no heavy-handed ideological messaging or singling out of dissenting perspectives as automatically evil.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Metalocalypse: The Doomstar Requiem - A Klok Opera

The Hidden Life of the Burrowing Owl

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.