George van de Jungle (2007) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

George van de Jungle2007

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'George of the Jungle' (2007) is a harmless, non-woke reboot favoring physical comedy over preaching. No heavy ideological themes or forced representation here, just good old-fashioned cartoon silliness.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The 2007 'George of the Jungle' reboot is largely a slapstick comedy aimed at children, not a soapbox for ideological messaging. Characters are comedic and exaggerated, and diversity is not forced. Most of the focus is on classic cartoon gags rather than overt identity politics.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show doesn't take aim at traditional values, family, or masculinity. If anything, it pokes fun at classic tropes in a goofy, lighthearted way. No attempt is made to subvert or rewrite cultural or historical norms in any significant fashion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s little ideological preaching or caricaturing of dissenting views. The plotlines focus on absurd jungle hijinks with the occasional playful jab at authority, but nothing particularly modern or agenda-driven.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

13%

Movie poster for Here Comes Peter Cottontail: The Movie

Movie poster for The Legend of Frosty the Snowman

Movie poster for Santa Mouse and the Ratdeer

Victoria

A Bug and a Bag of Weed

Movie poster for Caillou's Holiday Movie

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.