Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

94%

Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies retrofits a classic era with heavy-handed modern ideology. If you’re looking for nostalgia, brace yourself for a lesson in how ‘woke’ can outshine story and authenticity. This one definitely earns its place near the top of the woke meter.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies seems to prioritize identity and representation over plot and character depth, with casting and messaging often taking spotlight over natural storytelling. Modern themes are inserted into a 1950s setting in a way that can feel jarring, detracting from narrative authenticity and organic character growth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series regularly subverts traditional gender roles and updates 1950s social dynamics to fit contemporary values. Masculinity is often downplayed or satirized, and the show takes liberties with historical attitudes towards family, dating, and morality, making the setting feel far more progressive than period-accurate.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints are mostly absent or caricatured, with traditional values frequently mocked or portrayed as simplistic. The characters largely share modern sensibilities about race, gender, and identity, with little genuine debate, creating a noticeable ideological echo chamber.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.