Guerrilla (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

85%

Guerrilla2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Guerrilla doesn’t hold back on its identity-focused and politically-charged storytelling, strongly aligning with modern woke sensibilities. Narrative and nuance tend to take the backseat to ideology, making it a textbook example of the current Hollywood trend.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Guerrilla centers heavily on race and revolutionary politics, structuring its narrative around the struggles of radical activists. It appears that character identities were prioritized over nuanced personalities, with representation driving many casting and storytelling decisions, at times overshadowing organic character development.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show frequently portrays traditional institutions, such as police, government, and cultural norms, as oppressive or corrupt, often sidelining positive depictions of family, religion, or traditional morality. Masculinity and authority are largely subverted or villainized throughout the narrative.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Dissenting or less radical perspectives are almost exclusively presented through antagonists or caricatured figures. There’s little meaningful debate or diversity of worldview, with the show’s moral compass solidly rooted in its political ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

65%

32%

23%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.