Harry Enfield and Chums (1994) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Harry Enfield and Chums1994

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

This is about as non-woke as it gets. Harry Enfield and Chums delivers classic, equal-opportunity mockery, steering clear of today’s ideological sermonizing. If you’re burnt out on identity politics in TV, this is a refreshing blast from the past.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Harry Enfield and Chums is rooted in sketch comedy that focuses on exaggerated stereotypes and character-driven humor, not identity checklists or ideological narrative twists. Casting and plotlines lean heavily on comedic timing and social satire, not forced representation or political messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show often playfully lampoons traditional British culture, masculinity, and class, but does so with an ironic, self-deprecating tone that feels rooted in affection more than subversion. There’s little evidence of deliberate cultural revisionism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints abound, often in caricature form, satirizing all stripes of British society, from posh to working class. No single perspective dominates, and the sketches poke fun at everyone equally, long before ideological purity tests.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The League of Gentlemen

10%

15%

15%

12%

Movie poster for A Dance to the Music of Time

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.