Hello Tomorrow! (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

65%

Hello Tomorrow!2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Hello Tomorrow!" strikes a balance between classic genre storytelling and modern representation. There’s a noticeable woke influence, but it doesn’t overpower the narrative. The show wades into ideological territory, though it mainly chooses style and character drama over activism. Not egregiously woke, but it ticks enough boxes to stand out.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The show features several diverse characters, but it generally prioritizes storytelling over overtly pushing identity. While there are moments where representation feels a bit on-the-nose, most character arcs attempt to serve the narrative first and foremost, with only occasional dips into forced dynamics.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Some traditional roles and family dynamics are present but are often complicated or subverted. There are touches of skepticism toward classic ideas of success and masculinity, though the focus remains more on themes of ambition and deception than on criticizing cultural foundations outright.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints are not wholly absent, but most characters operate within a modern, progressive moral framework. There's a tendency to minimize traditional perspectives, though it's not flagrantly mocking or villainizing them at every turn.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

91%

18%

37%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.