I Think You Should Leave with Tim Robinson (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

I Think You Should Leave with Tim Robinson2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“I Think You Should Leave” is about as non-woke as modern comedy comes. It cheerfully ignores the identity and ideological concerns that dominate so much contemporary media, aiming for laughs, not lectures. A rare safe haven from the usual Hollywood checklist.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show’s focus is on absurdist and surreal sketch comedy, not on identity politics or message-driven content. Characters are chosen for comedic effect, not as platforms for “woke” representation. Narrative is driven by classic comedic escalation and awkwardness, not ideology. There’s barely even a standard narrative to be compromised.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Family, religion, masculinity, and other cultural institutions are occasionally lampooned, but it’s all in service of universal humor, not as targeted critique. The humor here is so bizarre and context-free that it rarely feels like it’s subverting cultural foundations for an ideological point.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

No clear ideological monoculture. The show ridicules all types of people equally and refrains from pushing any overt worldview. If anything, it’s actively uninterested in politics, focusing on universal social awkwardness and bizarre situations.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

93%

80%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.