The show focuses primarily on retelling a real-life criminal case, sticking closely to investigative journalism and documentary style. There is minimal emphasis on fashionable identity politics or forced representation, instead sticking to the people involved and the facts of the case. Any narrative choices mostly serve to build suspense rather than ideology.

While some may argue that the documentary’s commentary briefly questions social structures, it does not aggressively undermine Indian traditions, religion, or masculinity. Instead, it primarily examines the justice system and the realities of law enforcement, sidestepping overt cultural revisionism or gender role subversion.

The series attempts to present events through interviews and evidence, and largely refrains from villainizing dissenting viewpoints or pushing a singular ideological message. It does not heavily editorialize or present alternative perspectives as mere caricatures, keeping its tone investigative rather than activist.