INXS : Never Tear Us Apart (2014) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

INXS : Never Tear Us Apart2014

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'INXS: Never Tear Us Apart' is refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards. The story stays rooted in real-life band drama, free from heavy-handed modern ideological messaging or rewriting of cultural norms.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The miniseries focuses on the rise and struggles of INXS, staying true to the personalities, relationships, and events of the time. There isn't an obvious prioritization of modern identity politics over narrative or character development. It aims for authenticity, not forced representation.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show reflects the rock-and-roll spirit of 1980s/90s Australia without excessive criticism of masculinity, family, or traditional values. Its depiction of hedonism is more about historical reflection than ideological statements.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's little to suggest an agenda or the mocking of alternative viewpoints. The series is more about the band's journey and the era, avoiding current-day ideological battles. Alternative worldviews or traditional stances aren't villainized or caricatured.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

78%

65%

Movie poster for Peter Allen: Not the Boy Next Door

Movie poster for Blue Murder: Killer Cop

Movie poster for MasterChef Australia: The Professionals

The Hamster Decides

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.