Jekyll and Hyde (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Jekyll and Hyde2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Jekyll and Hyde’ (2015) leans into classic storytelling rather than current ideological trends. Little forced diversity or moral revisionism here, just good old-fashioned monster drama with minimal woke interference.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

In our view, 'Jekyll and Hyde' (2015) stays quite true to its roots, focusing on supernatural intrigue and personal conflict rather than pushing identity politics. Characters appear to be cast and developed based on narrative necessity, not positioning them as token symbols for modern causes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show doesn’t appear to make a habit of mocking tradition, religion, or masculinity. It incorporates familiar moral lines, good, evil, duality, without modern revisionism. Traditional themes like family, legacy, and inner struggle remain central, not subverted.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's a lack of overtly modern ideological messaging. Good and evil are personal, not political or woke identities. Dissenting and traditional perspectives are depicted with sincerity, not as strawman caricatures, keeping things refreshingly pluralistic.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

30%

Movie poster for The Trials of Jimmy Rose

Movie poster for Romeo and Juliet - Live at Shakespeare's Globe

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.