Judith Krantz's Till We Meet Again (1989) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Judith Krantz's Till We Meet Again1989

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Judith Krantz's Till We Meet Again’ is a classic, pre-woke miniseries that focuses on storytelling instead of ideology. It handles diverse perspectives with nuance and avoids the pitfalls of forced representation or mandatory groupthink.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This 1989 miniseries centers on character-driven, intergenerational drama, with identity rarely trumping merit or narrative goals. Major arcs develop organically, with attention to nuance and authenticity. Forced representation, as it's currently understood, is virtually absent.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The story does not overtly undermine religion, family, or traditional morality. While it explores love affairs and drama, it largely treats traditional cultural norms with either respect or neutrality, as was common in adaptations of the era.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The show offers a mix of traditional and progressive characters, reflecting genuine conflict. Alternative perspectives are depicted with sincerity, not just as strawmen. There is little evidence of modern ideological groupthink or villainization of dissent.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

33%

Movie poster for Perry Mason: The Case of the Silenced Singer

Taxi to Soweto

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.