King of Collectibles: The Goldin Touch (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

King of Collectibles: The Goldin Touch2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘King of Collectibles: The Goldin Touch’ is about as non-woke as you’ll find these days. It keeps its eye on the collectibles prize, shunning ideological preaching and leaving the narrative intact. A breath of fresh air in a seaworld of agenda-driven media.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show focuses primarily on auctions and collectibles, where merit and expertise drive the narrative. There is minimal focus on identity politics, and the personalities are chosen for their relevance to the collectibles industry, not for box-checking.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional ideas around family business, entrepreneurship, and the American marketplace are front and center without snarky subversion or undermining. There's no noticeable attack on masculinity, religion, or tradition, if anything, these values are just part of the backdrop.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's a neutral, apolitical tone throughout, and if you're looking for ideological preaching (from any direction), you'll be disappointed. The show sticks to its lane, collectibles and auctions, and doesn't ridicule or villianize differing worldviews.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Duck Dynasty: The Revival

92%

Movie poster for History's Greatest of All Time with Peyton Manning

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.