King of Stonks (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

70%

King of Stonks2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘King of Stonks’ indulges in some modern ideological themes and satirical jabs at traditional power. It isn’t a parade of woke sermonizing, but it’s no bastion of traditional storytelling either, expect a hefty smattering of modern satire with a dash of posturing.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The show mainly focuses on the darkly comedic rise and fall in the finance world, rather than making identity politics its main plot engine. While there are some diverse secondary characters, emphasis still lies on the story’s corrupt, ambitious anti-heroes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional values, corporate structures, and masculinity are frequently mocked or depicted as dysfunctional. The series leans into satirizing power and greed, sometimes undermining classical notions of business or personal morality, but doesn’t completely reject them.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Though alternative viewpoints mostly appear through absurd caricatures, the focus stays predominantly on critiquing the excesses of tech and finance. There’s mild ideological slant, but not the total uniformity seen in more aggressively woke productions.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Lass dich überwachen! – Die PRISM IS A DANCER Show

Movie poster for Drinnen - Im Internet sind alle gleich

94%

89%

Movie poster for Dr. Böhmermanns Struwwelpeter

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.