Kiseki: Dear To Me (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

90%

Kiseki: Dear To Me2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Kiseki: Dear To Me" checks nearly every box on the woke scorecard. Identity-driven storytelling takes precedence, traditional values are recast as hurdles, and all major characters share a uniform, ideologically progressive outlook. Traditionalists, brace yourselves.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The central romance is a same-sex relationship, and much of the plot openly centers on LGBTQ+ themes, often prioritizing these aspects over more universal or traditional story elements. Character traits related to identity frequently overshadow personal growth or complexity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series largely reframes cultural and familial expectations through a modern, progressive lens, often portraying traditional values as obstacles. Masculinity and traditional gender roles are downplayed; the narrative elevates non-traditional relationships as superior while familial (especially parental) authority is challenged or softened.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or more traditional perspectives are rarely given sympathetic airtime. Most characters quickly embrace a progressive worldview on sexuality, leaving little room for debate or internal conflict, and detractors are typically one-dimensional or unsympathetic.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for More than Blue: The Series

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.