Life Lessons with Uramichi Oniisan (2021) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Life Lessons with Uramichi Oniisan2021

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Life Lessons with Uramichi Oniisan avoids nearly all the typical woke trappings, focusing instead on the universal pain of adulthood. If you’re after a non-woke watch, this is about as safe as it gets in modern anime.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The series centers on adult themes of disillusionment and existential dread, letting its quirky characters’ personalities shine without prioritizing identity politics or forced representation. Character arcs and humor focus on the realities of adulthood, not ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While it pokes fun at modern life and social expectations, it doesn't target traditional cultural foundations or values. Religion, family, and masculinity are addressed playfully if at all, without undermining or pathologizing them.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

No push for ideological uniformity here. If anything, the show satirizes the idea of surface-level positivity. Traditional and alternative views on adulthood get lampooned evenly, without villainizing dissent or preaching a modern moral consensus.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

13%

Movie poster for The Reincarnation of the Strongest Exorcist in Another World

12%

Movie poster for Moriyamachu Driving School

Movie poster for Sinbad - Night at High Noon and the Wonder Gate

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.