Lincoln Rhyme: Hunt for the Bone Collector (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

75%

Lincoln Rhyme: Hunt for the Bone Collector2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

While not the most egregious example of Hollywood wokeness, Lincoln Rhyme: Hunt for the Bone Collector clearly sacrifices some narrative and cultural authenticity in favor of ‘correct’ representation and ideology. It’s your standard modern procedural with all the familiar woke trappings.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The show noticeably leans into identity-driven casting, particularly with the lead female detective replacing her book counterpart. Character development is present but sometimes secondary to social messaging, making skill and merit feel sidelined. Still, the crime procedural roots anchor some traditional narrative qualities.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles and family structures are largely absent or downplayed, with the series elevating female and minority characters as central heroes. Masculine traits are softened, and the show falls into the familiar pattern of portraying established institutions as flawed or corrupt.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews rarely get a fair shake. Most characters share progressive social assumptions, and dissenting perspectives, when present, are typically associated with antagonists or incompetence. There’s little real debate or plurality here.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.