Lip Service (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Lip Service2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“Lip Service” is very much a product of its time, an early foray into the BBC’s embrace of identity-driven storytelling. For non-woke viewers, its lack of narrative balance, focus on modern ideology, and sidelining of tradition makes it a textbook example of the woke wave in early 2010s television.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

"Lip Service" spotlights LGBTQ relationships and heavily emphasizes character identities over more traditional narrative complexity or arc-driven storytelling. Some viewers may feel the focus on diversity sometimes comes at the expense of plot nuance or character depth, prioritizing representation above more universal themes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show rather pointedly sidelines traditional family structures, religion, and masculine perspectives, centering a modern, urban, openly queer lifestyle. Legacy cultural values are rarely engaged with; when they are, it’s often with a critical or dismissive slant, undermining any sense of traditionalism or continuity.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or dissenting views on sexuality, gender, or family are pretty much absent, or, when touched upon, tend to be depicted in a negative or outdated light. The characters and world of "Lip Service" operate within a progressive ideological bubble, with little room for pluralism or debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.