Locked Up: The Oasis (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Locked Up: The Oasis2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Locked Up: The Oasis' ramps up the wokeness, prioritizing modern identity themes over classic narrative depth. Traditions get tossed aside, and ideological diversity barely gets a cameo. This is a textbook example of Hollywood's new normal, heavy on the message, light on the nuance.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

'Locked Up: The Oasis' leans heavily into character backgrounds tied to gender, sexuality, and diversity. In our view, these elements often overshadow organic character growth, sometimes creating the sense that storylines are built around checking representation boxes rather than genuine development.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional notions of family, morality, and gender roles are largely set aside or cast in a negative light throughout the series. The show appears to champion modern identity politics and tends to paint cultural institutions as relics or oppressive forces.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Viewers will notice the near-universal adoption of progressive worldviews among the main characters, with little room for sincere debate or traditional perspectives. Any dissent seems relegated to villainous or deeply flawed characters, minimizing real plurality of thought.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

13%

38%

70%

52%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.