Lovestruck in the City (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Lovestruck in the City2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Lovestruck in the City’ is a straightforward modern romance, focusing on universal themes rather than ideological lectures. Extremely mild on the woke scale, just the usual bits of urban modernity, nothing for non-woke viewers to worry about.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

In our view, 'Lovestruck in the City' is largely focused on relationship drama and personal growth. While there is some modern emphasis on individual expression, identity politics and forced representation do not drive the story. The characters are decently grounded and have flaws and growth arcs typical of the romance genre.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show presents romance, family, and traditional values in a fairly neutral light, without overtly undermining masculinity or cultural institutions. There is some modern urban attitude, but nothing resembling a crusade against longstanding social norms.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints aren’t demonized here, and while the narrative is contemporary, it doesn't villainize traditional ideas or create ideological strawmen. The plot is built around realistic personal and romantic struggles, not political crusades.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

25%

Movie poster for What's Wrong with Secretary Kim

12%

Movie poster for Romance Is a Bonus Book

28%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.