Mad Dogs (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Mad Dogs2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Mad Dogs keeps its priorities on story, tension, and real human flaws, not woke messaging. It’s non-woke by today’s standards, refreshingly lacking forced representation or ideological moralizing, focusing instead on character-driven drama and dark humor.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Mad Dogs centers on a group of middle-aged men facing chaos and moral dilemmas, not ticking diversity checkboxes. Characters feel organic, their flaws and personalities driving the plot, rather than identity politics. The show doesn’t force diverse casting or flawless leads for the sake of it, staying grounded in its storytelling roots.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The series deals honestly with masculinity, friendship, and midlife crises without mocking traditional roles. Family, loyalty, and personal values are explored as both strengths and weaknesses. Religion and classic cultural ideas are neither undermined nor excessively highlighted; the focus stays on character dynamics.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There’s a bit of standard modern cynicism, but no heavy-handed caricature of more ‘traditional’ perspectives. Pluralism is present among the group’s personalities and worldviews, and no obvious ideological preaching stands out. Debates and flaws feel natural, not agenda-driven.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.