Magnum P.I. (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

65%

Magnum P.I.2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Magnum P.I. (2018) updates the franchise with a few fashionable choices, like a female Higgins, softening some classic elements for modern sensibilities. It’s not aggressively woke, but it definitely leans into today’s trends more than pure tradition.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Magnum P.I. (2018) makes some changes to classic characters, notably gender-swapping Higgins. While some might see this as refreshing, others could view it as prioritizing representation over paying homage to original character dynamics. Most stories remain action-based, but identity-focused updates do occasionally overshadow legacy elements.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show still celebrates traditional values like heroism, camaraderie, and personal responsibility. However, modern reimaginings, such as updated gender roles and toned-down masculine bravado, reflect a push in more current directions, sometimes coming at the expense of the original's classic charm.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

While Magnum P.I. includes diverse characters and aims for a modern atmosphere, it mostly avoids overt lectures and caricatures of dissenters. Alternative perspectives, however, are underrepresented, there’s little genuine discussion about worldviews different from the prevailing Hollywood consensus.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.