Mammals (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

52%

Mammals2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Mammals isn’t a fully woke manifesto, but it certainly tips its hat to modern sensibilities more than traditional ones. Those tired of shows dunking on classic values or lightly winking at contemporary ideologies might find it frustrating, but it doesn’t go totally off the woke deep end.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While 'Mammals' includes some modern themes and relationship dynamics, the show overall doesn't entirely sacrifice character depth or plot for ideology. There is some emphasis on identity and social commentary, but not at the expense of compelling storytelling or making all diverse characters superhuman or untouchable.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show digs into marriage and traditional relationships, often spotlighting dysfunction and dissatisfaction. It’s not exactly a love letter to traditional family life, but it doesn’t wholly ridicule or demonize it either. Still, the narrative leans toward critiquing or subverting classic roles more than affirming them.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

There’s a mild sense that more traditional perspectives are either sidelined or depicted as outdated. Some characters flirt with alternative viewpoints, but the overall message tends to skew toward modern, progressive values, with little sincere space given for non-woke voices or meaningful debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

30%

35%

60%

22%

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.