Man in an Orange Shirt (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Man in an Orange Shirt2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Man in an Orange Shirt’ puts progressive social themes above character nuance and narrative subtlety. With traditional values largely sidelined or vilified, and little room for dissenting perspectives, it lands firmly in the very woke camp.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series openly prioritizes themes of sexual identity and social oppression over more traditional storytelling devices. Heavy emphasis is placed on characters' sexuality as a defining trait, often at the expense of broader character exploration or subtlety.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Family and traditional morality are portrayed as restrictive or even damaging, with stable relationships undermined by the pursuit of self-actualization. The narrative often frames religion and conservative values as forces of repression rather than sources of meaning or stability.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional viewpoints are mostly depicted as antagonistic or outdated, leaving little room for genuine exploration or sympathy. The show strongly favors a single ideological interpretation, with minimal genuine debate or internal conflict.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

30%

12%

12%

Movie poster for And Then There Were None

80%

Movie poster for Frankenstein's Wedding... Live in Leeds

35%

85%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.