Masked Rider DCD (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Masked Rider DCD2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Masked Rider DCD is as non-woke as they come, a straightforward, action-packed hero romp that’s blissfully free from modern ideological intrusions.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Masked Rider DCD focuses on plot-driven action, classic hero vs. villain storytelling, and only rarely delves into identity topics. Characters are chosen for their fit within the franchise’s tokusatsu style, not for fulfilling identity quotas. There is no clear evidence of narrative being sacrificed for ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show generally sticks to traditional superhero themes, friendship, courage, sacrifice, and the importance of teamwork. It doesn’t undermine traditional family, faith, or masculinity; rather, it more often reinforces classic values and tropes common within Japanese hero shows.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s little to no emphasis on pushing modern ideological talking points. Villains and heroes are depicted through traditional archetypes, and there’s no overt caricaturing or villainization of non-modern perspectives. The worldview is broad and focused on action and adventure rather than ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Hyakujuu Sentai Gaoranger

Movie poster for My SO Has Got Depression

Movie poster for The Summit: A Chronicle Of Stones to Serenity

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.