Masters of Sex (2013) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

65%

Masters of Sex2013

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Masters of Sex is mostly interested in reinterpreting sexual liberation through a modern lens, sometimes at the expense of balance or nuance. While its historical setting gives some reason for this focus, viewers seeking a less ideologically driven story may find the show steeped in contemporary social messaging.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Masters of Sex often emphasizes social themes related to gender, sexuality, and race alongside its central narrative. While the historical context justifies exploring these issues, at times, the show foregrounds identity-based narratives that can overshadow character-driven storytelling or realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show frequently questions traditional views on marriage, gender, and sexuality, portraying conventional morality as stifling. Religion and traditional family dynamics are often depicted as repressive or limiting, which some viewers could interpret as undermining cultural foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

While some dissenting perspectives are portrayed, traditionalists and skeptics are routinely cast as obstacles or caricatures. The main cast and storylines consistently lean toward progressive interpretations of sexuality and gender, limiting ideological diversity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.