Merlí (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

60%

Merlí2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Merlí' leans into progressive themes, sometimes at the expense of traditional viewpoints, but generally focuses more on nuanced character development and philosophical debate than pushing a strong 'woke' agenda. It’s moderately woke but avoids the worst Hollywood excesses.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While 'Merlí' is primarily centered on philosophy and features well-developed and diverse characters, it doesn’t excessively focus on identity politics. Still, some character arcs and themes could be interpreted as leaning into modern social values, but they generally stem from organic storytelling rather than overt ideological messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show often questions traditional roles, especially around family, religion, and authority. Masculinity is sometimes portrayed as outdated or flawed, but it's not done so aggressively. 'Merlí' explores complex topics from a progressive standpoint without entirely dismissing traditional values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

There’s a noticeable emphasis on modern, progressive thinking, and traditional or dissenting perspectives are sometimes caricatured or glanced over. The show is more interested in exploring philosophy and challenging norms than providing genuine balance of views.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Peret: The King of the Gipsy Rumba

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.