Milo Murphy's Law (2016) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Milo Murphy's Law2016

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Milo Murphy’s Law is a rare non-woke gem in the modern cartoon landscape. The emphasis stays on fun, friendship, and clever storytelling, avoiding the trendy heavy-handed messaging seen elsewhere. A breath of fresh air for viewers tired of ideology-first entertainment.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Milo Murphy’s Law focuses on comedic misadventures and clever problem-solving more than identity checklists. Characters feel organic within the tone and world, without obvious emphasis on forced diversity or hyper-competence based on identity. It’s primarily a fun, traditional animated sitcom.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show treats family and friendship positively and even has a strong, quirky male lead overcoming adversity. There’s little if any undermining of traditional values or subversive messaging regarding masculinity, gender roles, or cultural revisionism. It’s refreshingly apolitical.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Milo Murphy’s Law primarily avoids overt political or ideological messages. There’s no clear villainization of traditional perspectives, nor are alternative worldviews mocked or sidelined. It’s comfortably pluralistic, prioritizing entertainment over lectures.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

Movie poster for ZOMBIES: The Re-Animated Series Shorts

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.