Miss Marple: The Moving Finger (1985) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Miss Marple: The Moving Finger1985

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A nearly textbook example of non-woke storytelling; Miss Marple: The Moving Finger puts classic mystery above politics, preserving the style and cultural values of Christie’s original work. Refreshingly free of modern ideological filters.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This adaptation sticks closely to Agatha Christie’s source material, prioritizing classic mystery storytelling over modern identity politics. Characters are cast for narrative fit rather than representation. There’s no sign of forced or hyperbolic character traits.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values like family, community, and morality are portrayed without subversion. There’s no evidence of cultural revisionism or the undermining of religion, gender roles, or British heritage. Masculinity and femininity are depicted as they were in the original era.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews are not mocked, if anything, the small-town setting gently pokes fun at everyone equally. There’s no ideological preaching or dogma. Any ‘monoculture’ simply reflects 1940s England, not modern narratives.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Agatha Christie's Poirot

10%

10%

Movie poster for Miss Marple: Sleeping Murder

The Dark Side of the Sun

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.