Monzón: A Knockout Blow (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

Monzón: A Knockout Blow2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Monzón: A Knockout Blow sticks closely to its historical and cultural roots, avoiding the hallmarks of ‘woke’ storytelling. It’s more interested in realism than ideology, making it a rare example of modern TV that isn’t trying to rewrite history or cultural norms.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The series largely adheres to the real-life story of Carlos Monzón, focusing on his boxing career and personal life without shoehorning in modern ideological themes or making representation choices disconnected from the setting. Characters fit the historical and cultural context.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show explores themes like masculinity, violence, family, and fame within the context of 1970s-80s Argentina. While it critiques toxic aspects of Monzón's behavior, it approaches them through the lens of real events, not as a vehicle for modern ideological messaging.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values, including the challenges and pitfalls of masculinity, are explored without reducing dissenting perspectives to mere caricature. The narrative reflects the era’s complexities rather than enforcing a monolithic worldview.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Crossing of the Andes

25%

Movie poster for The Old Woman at the Back

Movie poster for Andres Doesn't Want to Take a Nap

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.