Murder Is Easy (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

85%

Murder Is Easy2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

This adaptation feels like a classic work put through a contemporary filter, with identity-driven casting and values overriding period authenticity and traditional dynamics. For viewers weary of modern reinterpretations, it's a distinctly high-woke affair.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series updates Agatha Christie’s classic setting by casting a Black protagonist as the lead, a significant departure from the novel’s original retired British policeman. This recasting appears more ideological than organic, emphasizing identity over fit to the 1950s English rural context, which can feel forced to viewers who value faithfulness to source material and realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional British rural life and conservative values, typically central in Christie adaptations, take a backseat in favor of more modern identity themes. The portrayal of classic English village culture seems diluted, with underlying tones suggesting older social norms are outdated or problematic.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Most main characters appear to accept the protagonist’s presence and views with little tension, a surprising social dynamic for 1950s England. Minimal room is given to traditional perspectives, and dissenting voices are depicted as antagonistic, not sincerely represented.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.