No Offence (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

33%

No Offence2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘No Offence’ mostly delivers a grounded police procedural with an organically diverse cast and tough female leads. The woke elements are present but rarely overwhelm the storytelling, resulting in a show that mostly feels honest rather than agenda-driven.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

‘No Offence’ primarily focuses on narrative and character development rather than forcing identity politics. The diverse cast generally fits their roles within the gritty Manchester police setting, with identity factors feeling organic to the story rather than shoehorned for points.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

While the show features plenty of strong female leads and a fair share of irreverence, it doesn’t take aim at traditional family or religious values in any sustained way. There’s some subversion of gender roles, but mostly in service of gritty police drama tropes.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There’s certainly a modern UK cop-show sensibility, but the series doesn’t regularly caricature or villainize alternative worldviews. Some classic tropes are present, but it doesn’t feel ideologically rigid or monotonous in perspective.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

75%

Movie poster for Simon Amstell: Do Nothing - Live

68%

Logan High

Movie poster for The Grass Is Always Grindr

Movie poster for Richard Osman's House of Games

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.