Ōoku: The Inner Chambers (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

93%

Ōoku: The Inner Chambers2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Ōoku: The Inner Chambers is a highly woke reimagining of Japanese history, prioritizing identity and modern ideology over traditional storytelling and cultural authenticity.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series significantly alters historical gender roles, placing women in positions of authority over men regardless of realism for the period. Identity is foregrounded over more traditional character arcs, and these reversals tend to overshadow individual growth or flaws.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Ōoku: The Inner Chambers flips the script on traditional Japanese history and gender roles, putting women in charge and men in subservient roles. This reinterpretation of customs and power dynamics is about as “woke” as it gets for period pieces, undermining classic societal structures.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The worldview of the show is singularly modern and progressive, with traditional values, masculinity, and historical norms minimized or reimagined. Alternative perspectives are largely absent or presented through outdated or unsympathetic lenses.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for KONOSUBA - God's blessing on this wonderful world!

12%

Movie poster for Showa Genroku Rakugo Shinju

Movie poster for Jimmy: The True Story of a True Idiot

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.