Ozzy and Jack's World Detour (2016) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Ozzy and Jack's World Detour2016

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Ozzy and Jack’s World Detour is refreshingly non-woke, a rare travel show that focuses on personality and classic themes, steering well clear of the usual Hollywood trends. A safe bet for non-woke viewers.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show centers around Ozzy and Jack Osbourne exploring history, culture, and oddities. There's no forced representation or identity politics interfering with the main appeal, the father-son dynamic and genuine curiosity. Focus is on the journey and their personalities, not checking ideology boxes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Family bonds (father and son) are celebrated, and traditional interests like Americana, history, and classic road trips are front and center. There’s no subversion of faith, masculinity, or cultural tradition to speak of.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The program avoids hot-topic ideology. It’s more about curiosity and fun rather than making political or cultural statements, and no worldviews are majorly villainized or pushed. It simply doesn’t play in that sandbox.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings

Movie poster for RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars

98%

Movie poster for American Pickers: Best Of

Movie poster for Symon's Dinners Cooking Out

Movie poster for Gold Rush: Parker's Trail

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.