Philip K. Dick's Electric Dreams (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

78%

Philip K. Dick's Electric Dreams2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Electric Dreams" is unmistakably influenced by modern ideological trends. Social commentary and identity-driven casting often crowd out the original spirit of Philip K. Dick’s stories. While visually compelling, the show largely echoes the standard woke playbook.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

"Electric Dreams" features several episodes where casting and character focus seem notably driven by contemporary identity criteria, sometimes at the expense of narrative cohesion. Some episodes lean into heavy-handed social commentary, occasionally prioritizing ideology over plot complexity or character depth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Many stories subvert traditional roles and challenge ideas tied to family, religion, and gender. Masculine characters are often portrayed as weak, antagonistic, or outdated, while non-traditional arrangements are idealized. Classic cultural tropes are frequently reinterpreted through a present-day lens.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative, non-mainstream viewpoints rarely get a fair shake. Traditional values are often painted as obstacles or outright villainous, and dissenting voices, when present, typically serve as strawmen. There's little philosophical diversity in the moral conclusions the show reaches.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.