PJ Masks (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

PJ Masks2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

PJ Masks is a pretty safe bet for parents who prefer non-woke content. Its focus is on simple morals and teamwork rather than pushing any social agendas. Classic cartoon fun with little sign of 'woke' interference.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

PJ Masks focuses on storytelling that's typical for children's superhero adventures. The identities of the main characters are balanced and their traits are based more on personality and teamwork than identity politics. There's little evidence of narrative sacrificed for ideology here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional family values and heroism are not undermined in this show. PJ Masks tends to present friendship, courage, and collaboration in line with classic kids’ programming. There’s some modern sensibility, but no clear subversion of traditional cultural values, masculinity, or family.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The show generally avoids overt ideological messaging. While it lacks any real pluralism, it steers clear of caricaturing traditional viewpoints or promoting a monolithic worldview. Conflict is centered on age-appropriate morality, not modern ideological debates.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

40%

Movie poster for Love, Bubbles & Crystal Cove

Movie poster for Kiya & the Kimoja Heroes

Movie poster for DQE's Peter Pan: The New Adventures

60%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.