Quantum Leap (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

89%

Quantum Leap2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Quantum Leap (2022) dives head-first into a very modern, very woke template, prioritizing contemporary identity themes and sidelining both tradition and ideological diversity. Not much nostalgia here for the non-woke crowd.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Quantum Leap (2022) seems heavily invested in casting and character arcs that spotlight identity over story or merit, dialing up the representation factor at the expense of organic character growth. There’s a distinct shift towards ticking diversity boxes, often bypassing conflict or genuine flaws for sleek competence and identity messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show often places traditional values and masculine roles in the back seat, spinning them as things to be reformed or questioned while elevating new social norms as inherently superior. It also tends toward reframing historical events through a modern ideological lens, with little room for traditional interpretations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional worldviews are generally sidelined, with dissenting voices painted as unenlightened or even villainous. Most characters operate with the same progressive worldview, leaving little narrative room for real ideological debate or complexity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.