Reality Z (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

60%

Reality Z2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Reality Z incorporates a fair bit of modern ‘woke’ flavor, especially in its approach to character diversity and sidelining of older norms, but avoids going full preachy. It’s more trendy than revolutionary, with woke elements baked in, but not to an extreme.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The show features identity-driven casting, but character personalities and survival instincts play a more central role than ideological checklists. Some moments could be interpreted as favoring representation over organic character development, but by and large it sticks closer to zombie-thriller DNA than pure ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional institutions like family and religion are mostly sidelined, occasionally depicted as sources of conflict or moral ambiguity. Masculine and feminine traits are redistributed across characters, which may feel modern but doesn’t heavily ridicule either side. Subversion is present but not overwhelming.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

The show leans towards current social attitudes, rarely giving much screen time to opposing views. Traditional stances are present but often left underdeveloped or depicted as problematic, reinforcing monocultural storytelling without truly cartoonish villainization.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for L.O.C.A. – Liga das Obsessivas Compulsivas por Amor

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.