Robin Hood (2006) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

65%

Robin Hood2006

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

2006's Robin Hood offers a mostly classic adventure, but it's sprinkled with signs of early, mild wokeness, diverse casting, modern morality, and some revisionist takes. It's not full-blown, but certainly a product of the trend's beginnings.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While the show keeps the core Robin Hood narrative, it adds a hefty dose of modern sensibilities. Some casting and story choices appear to emphasize inclusion over historical realism, with certain characters reimagined in ways that fit 21st-century priorities more than medieval England.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The series often undermines traditional portrayals of nobility, faith, and masculinity, injecting modern attitudes and occasionally poking fun at old-fashioned values. There's a noticeable effort to challenge authority figures and reframe classic morality through a modern lens.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Although not as overt as some contemporary reboots, the show leans towards a singular, progressive worldview. Dissenting or traditional perspectives rarely get fair exploration, and characters either conform or serve as one-note antagonists.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

38%

Movie poster for Secret Diary of a Call Girl

45%

Family Business

Movie poster for The Hound of the Baskervilles

The Fitz

10%

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.